Posted by Michael Hughes on Thursday, May 19, 2011
I am a hopeless Aristotelian; I love to create classifications and taxonomies that make neat little boxes and then I put hopelessly messy realities into them. On my ride into work today, I created a way to classify all musicians (or more accurately the ways we are musicians) along two axes--thus creating four quadrants within which I can box myself or others.
The two axes are
The illustration above provides stereotypes for each of the quadrants.
There is nothing judgmental about this system, nor is one's position in a quadrant fixed. I, for one, can be found in quadrants I, II, or IV depending on when you snap the picture.
I do think, however, that your dominant quadrant can shape how you play. For example, I spent most of my life in quadrant I, playing folk songs on the guitar by ear and writing my own music. When I started learning Dobro, I stayed in that mode pretty much exclusively. As such, I have a tendency to want to maintain a full picking pattern as "background" and pick the melody line out as I lay down a carpet of notes around it.
I have a buddy who is primarily quadrant II. He's quite literate on piano, and although he learns guitar songs by ear, he can play a very literal rendering of the source he learned the song from. I don't do so well at learning by ear because I have a dyslexic ear. 1. 3. 5 and 1, 5, 3 sound alike to me. Or if I get 5 out of 7 notes, well that's as good as all 7. Unfortunately, playing by ear has been my learning style most of my life.
I've started operating in quadrant IV a lot--participating regularly in bluegrass jams, and this has driven me to quadrant II. I try to learn a song from a jam, but I can tell I'm not quite "getting it." So I have started to read music so that I can get the melody line correct. Then I arrange it for the Dobro. But my quadrant IV perspective has made it so I am not as compelled to lay down the carpet of notes any more. I'm getting used to having others establish the full body of a song, and I am learning to add grace licks or transitions. And since the Dobro does not play certain chords very well (open tuned to a G-major), I'm learning to pick through those awkward chords with delicate melody or harmony lines rather than playing robust multi-string chords.
I'll probably never get to quadrant III, although I envy those folks. That's where most session musicians operate, you know, folks who get paid to play. It's OK, just moving into II and IV has rejuvenated my appreciation of music and my enjoyment.
Be careful about quadrant IV, though, that's a real addictive neighborhood.
[copied from my other blog "The Humane Experience" http://user-assistance.blogspot.com/]
Friday, May 20, 2011 @7:02:14 AM
Heh... since I play primarily country (not listed) and am in a small band (not an 'orchestra') I assume that I am relegated to some sort of fifth dimension? Or worse, not worthy of being classified at all?
It's certainly a fun little mental masturbation, but it needs to be a bit more generic in description of the boxes if you want to classify 'all' musicians.
Michael Hughes Says:
Friday, May 20, 2011 @7:36:33 AM
The circles were meant to be illustrative examples, not a label for all the members of the set. So read it as "An example of someone who is literal and plays with others would be someone playing in an orchestra." Certainly, another example could be someone who plays in a school band, etc. It's like when you see an registration form online that says "John Doe" under the user name. You can still register even if your name isn't John Doe.
You must sign into your myHangout account before you can post comments.
'Reed For sale/trade' 1 day
'Reed Squareneck FS/T' 1 day